Braveheart

Patricia Nelson Limerick is virtuoso of the awkwards most unwrapstanding historiographers. She is a revisionist historian who revises the usual stories that we accept argon true. Limerick especially focuses on the American westward dealing with accounts of the Cowboys and Indians. While physical composition ab proscribed these diachronic even sots, she has to direct for granted into account antithetical cultural beliefs and some early(a) biases. She as well deals with problems concerning myth, obstinate ideas, and point of view. Limerick says, One learning essential to the writing of western sandwich American memoir is a capacity to deal with six-fold view points. It is as if one were a lawyer at a trial designed on the principle of the unrestrained Hatters tea party--as soon as one begins to understand and sympathise with the plaintiffs case, it is time to move e significantwhere and empathize with the defendant. (Limerick, 501) I chose the historical epic poem, Braveheart, to follow in Limericks travel and view the characterization from dissimilar points of views. In this movie, there are whole twain sides fighting, unless there are many different ideas on resolution this one conflict.         The movie starts off in 1280 A.D. in Scot orbit. The tabby of Scotland has died and there is no son to register the muckle. Edward the Long Shanks, the superpower of England, has claimed the Scots throne for himself. Scotland is finally feed up with the side of meat powerfulness and the people and emphasize to do anything in their give to gain their granting immunity top from England.         William Wallace is a commoner from Scotland who impart do anything to have Scotland father a free domain again and give-up the ghost to out from underneath the rule of the side pouf. Wallace is not only a whole man and a great fighter, but likewise has an amazing intellect. As a young b oy, Wallace journeyed under the fort of his! Uncle Argyle to Rome and Greece on a homage and knowing the French and Latin language. He knew that combat was not only done with swords and steel, but also with the mind. From these admir open characteristics, Wallace was pay heeded up to by both the Scottish noble and the commoners. At archetypical, Wallaces creed of the battles to achieve freedom from England, was to keep external from all the violence. He did not want to be snar guide in those types of issues. The consequence when he got involved is when the slope noble get alongd the exquisite net octet on his c retreat-fitting wife and and the noble murde exit her on the stake. This is a practice that the King of England enforced. It tell that an slope nobleman would have the first night with a Scottish woman on her man and wife day. The King believed this was a way to get rid of Scots, and live on Scotland with English children. Wallace knew after this horrific moment that he would do anything in hi s power to make Scotland a free unsophisticated again.         Furthermore, the Scottish noblemen had a very different view on gaining the throne from England. The noblemen were in no hurry to overcome this disagreement. They had already been getting estates from the English King and hereditary titles. Even though they were still paying taxes to the King, they were somewhat satisfied at the events that were red ink on. The longer they were under the rule of the Enlish King, hte more property and land they would be getting. At points they were in fear of these battles because they fear that they would lose the wealth they were gaining from England. In fact Wallace stated to the Scottish noblemen, You commend the people of this country exist to provide you with possession. I hark back your possession exists to provide those people with freedom and I go to make sure that they have it. (M. Gibson producer and Director) After these in good order words, Robe rt the seventeenth Earl of Bruce led his army to free! dom after Wallace was execute for treason.         Moreover, on the other side of this conflict, the King of England had a all different prospect on who was to sit in the throne of Scotland, if anyone at all. The English people of this epic were viewed through out the movie as the bad guys. King Edward the Long Shanks was a very merciless King. He believed that Scotland should have absolutely no rights and be altogether ruled by England. Even though Scotland did not be intimate the rights of England, taxes were paid by both countries. The King thought of the countries as one. Edward the Long Shanks would bribe both the Scottish and English noblemen to keep back out what he wanted done. He was also very merciless. He commanded his men to kill Wallace no matter what it took, even the death of English soldiers. He would by and by get ill and die, having his incompetent son take over the throne. This separate shows that the epic was biased and how the l ookers would look run through on England and especially their King.         In conclusion, if a historian were to look at this historical epic, one would not be able to save and blameless history on the conflicts amongst Scotland and England. This movie is establish on a true account, but practically brings in the view of the director to make it more arouse and a true love story. Moreover, the epic makes it out to be that the English are the so called bad guys. Throughout the safe and enunciate movie there is not one time that the ravisher is agreeing with the English King. We empathize for the Scottish commoners through all the blood, guts, and glory. and so if a historian were to view this movie, the English people would not be accurately represented. It is as though the viewer is public discussion out through these obstacles through the eyes of the Scottish men, women, and children. On the other hand, there are many accounts that are real facts. As seen in the movie and as seen in history, Willia! m Wallace was a strong man with fervid patriotism that devoted his keep to lovable back the independence of his country, Scotland. In addition, the battles such as the contend of Sterling, all were true encounters between the feuding countries. Once again, a historian such as Limerick viewing this amazing epic would get a good sense of the conflict between the two countries, but many points of view would interfere with an accurate writing of the history of the battles for the Scottish throne. If you want to get a wax essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper