'Autism and Development Disorders Essay\r'

'This article was establish on research d champion on tiddlerren ages three to ten years somewhat the temper and reactions of children with Autism. It discusses the differences betwixt those with Autism, and those without autism, specific wholey how they react, perceive, and get the best certain developmental musts in childhood. These results be taken from the Children’s Behavior Questionnaire, which be the sixteen dimensions of child perceptions, which includes activity direct, angriness and frustration, approach and withdrawal, and problems focusing. These atomic number 18 only a few behaviors they suggest help realize between children, as soundly as the different reactions that may suggest Autism is contribute in a child. This article hence discusses how they went about testing the groups of different children. They had one group as a control, kids that had previously been time-tested on the Child Autism paygrade Scale and proved negatively to having Autis m, and a group of kids that when previously tested, proved optimistic for Autism. They wanted to clear how the claim Regulation, and temperament varied between the groups.\r\nTo test this Konstantareas and Stewart equanimous a test group of cardinal children in all with previous proven forms of Autism and tested them with a created Demographic Questionnaire. In this questionnaire it requests what range a child ask roundd on the Child Autism Rating Scale, as thoroughly as investigating the income bracket in which distributively family would be placed, as well as an additional examination to foresee out the child’s level of cognitive functioning. Testing what Kostantareas and Stewart call the DP II which is a rating for children from giving birth to age nine, tapping into stills in five areas of functioning, including physical, self-help, social, academic, and communication. afterwards all of the data was poised all of the children with Autism Spectrum were combi ned and apply to determine if they had Affect Regulation. The results indicated that the children with ASD (Autism Spectrum Dis indian lodge) were more likely to employ their refuse level of AR strategies, such as trying to hide an object or keep in longer, rather than to ask if they could keep the object or presently return it to the experimenter.\r\nThis experiment also suggests that those diagnosed with ASD performed worsened than the control group without ASD, suggesting those with Autism perform at a lower standard than those without. aft(prenominal) reading this article and gathering all the information, I’ve formed my own ideas on Konstantareas and Stewart’s attendings. In their later outline on what they found, they suggest that children with ASD develop slower, and are found to be less equal than those who don’t. I feel on that point was flaw in this testing, or else of examine these ASD patients with a control group they should be compared to others with ASD in different settings. This study suggests some limitations posed by the collecting of data, including assumptions do based on previous research, and the blemish collection places could’ve resulted in skewed findings. They salt a bearing this information over the phone via the parents in a control room setting. early(a) contributors in this study suggest that maybe a more accurate authority to measure a child’s AR would be in a less controlled setting such as school, or home.\r\nThis would help with the data collected to be more accurate because the tested children would be more comfortable in their environment, and may perform reform in a comfortable place. Which I check off with, the only trend to see how a child truly acts, and reacts to certain problems is to see them in the environment they’re used to, children are susceptible and can be swayed easily by some intimacy they see in a control room setting. In this article it suggests that cognitive development is alone linked to AR, which I think is false. To utter that Affect Regulation is the only way to successfully measure a child’s growth is an inaccurate way to think, I think however that a child’s growth is mensurable by a number of things non just how they measure on a scale of AR. This article also suggests that moderate temperament scales is a way to better measure children with and without ASD. I disagree completely and feel the only way to receive accurate results in the measurement of a child’s temperament is to garble how the results overall were collected, not the scale they were measured on.\r\nThis change should evidence these ASD children individually instead of lumping them together in a ensample on a scale. The final thing this article suggests is creating some comparisons in and between subgroups, limiting factors to subcategories and trends from within the group as a whole, once again not representing the individ uals but a group of quasi(prenominal) ASD children, no exceptions accounted for. There are a few things about this article I agree with. It suggests that children’s feelings for determining ASD cannot be properly measured by interviews, because children with ASD do not regularly show feelings, and when they do express them in a truly different way than those without ASD. It suggests that a bare-ass study should be through with(p) to show the â€Å"true temperament” (pg. 10) of the kids in order to achieve the most accurate results.\r\nThese researchers should find children with ASD that ask both extremely onerous cases, and those with more mild cases, test them against each other, and compare them to the differences of those without any form of ASD. If done this suggested way they would predict to the greatest cogency how AR exists in ASD children, and in what ways it hindered them performing everyday activities. In umteen ways ASD affects children with Autism ’s AR and temperament. clear up and effective ways to measure these in diagnosed children must be done in order to see what disabilities they may have in performing tasks later on in everyday life.\r\n'