Ban Public Smoking And Save Lives

Public pot is hazardous to health. It has already been identified by medical authorities as a major threat to normal health, as a reveal contributor to preventable deaths anywhere in the world. It exposes non- supergrassrs to sustain pass away smoke (SHS), which is a mixture of the smoke given off by the anxious end of a cigarette, pipe or cigar and the smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers and which has proven to be almost as dangerous as the cigarette smoke instantly inhaled by smokers.In fact, it is believed that a nonsmoker who is closeted in a room with some(prenominal) smokers for an hour inhales dangerous chemicals equivalent to that contained in ten or more sticks of cigarette. (Cooper) cigarette 2 Reports issued by the office of the Surgeon General declared that second cash in ones chips smoke (or passive locoweed), was considered a contributory factor in everyplace 50,000 deaths every year during the early 1990s. cigarette 5 On the other wad, LawsuitSearch.co m cigarette 6stated that since it has already been clinic in ally proven that citizenry heart-to-heart to secondary smoke are disposed to lung cancer, heart disease, asthma, chronic bronchitis, and other related diseases, employers who force their workers to be exposed to second hand smoke are now valid respondents to lawsuits. Meanwhile, an venture made in the United Kingdom of deaths attributable to second hand smoke in the workplace and at home for the year 2003, undercoat out that a total 617 employees died at the workplace while 2726 passel aged 20-64, and 7959 over-65 year olds died from exposure to second hand smoke at home.Fatal strokes and heart disease aggravated by passive green goddess (second hand smoke) were identified as the culprits in over 3,000 of the expressions. (Jamrozik) cigarette 8 These entropy certainly strengthens the case against second hand smoke. Allowed freely in human beings places, it can rattling prove harmful to nonsmokers. Armed with a p revalence of clinical data gathered around the globe, countries the world over, in what appears to be a conjunctive effort to save mankind from diseases caused or aggravated by second hand smoke, have, one after another, enacted laws declaring smoking in general areas illegal.The giving medication of the Greater Kashmir forbiddingned it as early as 2002, with the term public places encompassing public offices, educational institutions, hospital buildings, libraries, auditoriums, public conveyance including railways, and speak to buildings. (Tobacco. org. ) public smoking 3 In France, Chrisafris (2006) reported that the public smoking ban which leave take effect February 2007 will cover universities, railway stations, and offices, while nightclubs, cafes, restaurants and proscribe were told to be ready for the ban a year after.public smoking 7 Meanwhile, the ban in Hongkong which took effect January 1, 2007, included all indoor places such as restaurants, public places, workplac es, karaoke lounges, and bars. (Washburn, 2007) public smoking 8 Over in Canada, smoking in public places will be prohibited in Quebec effective February 1, 2007, and smoking in bars, restaurants, nightclubs and cafes will be banned starting January 1, 2008. (Greenaway, 2007) The evidence against the hazards of public smoking can no longer be ignored, and the rest of the world has already spoken public smoking essential be banned if we exigency a healthy citizenry.The United States should now stop patronizing the tobacco industry and enforce a total ban on all public places in the country, because people are already dying. Smokers may posit their emancipation to smoke as they wish when, where, or in what manner. However, people have now decided that enough is enough that individual freedom can only be exercised as far as it doesnt curtail other peoples own freedoms. Their right to smoke, therefore, must never prejudice nonsmokers right to inhale smoke-free air and, therefore, r ack up years to their lives.Given the number of deaths occurring each year in countries around the world, public smoking could even be considered an act of homicide through reckless imprudence REFERENCES Chrisafis, A. (2006). France sets find for public smoking ban. Guardian Unlimited. (Retrieved from http//www. guardian. co. uk/smoking/story/0,,1890866,00. html) Cooper, P. G. (2005). Hazards of Smoking. University of Michigan omnibus(prenominal) Cancer Center. (Retrieved from http//www. cancer. med. umich.edu/prevention/hazards_of_smoking. shtml) Greenaway, N. (2007). CanWest News Service. The Gazette. (Retrieved from http//www. canada. com/montrealgazette/news/story. html? id=c414c2a9-9d63-4bae-9c28-a2543ac. 59025) Jamrozik, K. (2005). Estimate of deaths attributable to passive smoking among UK adults Database analysis. BMJ. (Retrieved from http//www. bmj. com/cgi/content/abridged/330/7495/812) LawsuitSearch. com. (2006). (Retrieved from http//www. lawsuitsearch. com/product-lia bility/smoke-exposure.aspx) The Reports of the Surgeon General second-string Smoking, Individual Rights, and Public Space. (n. d. ). Profiles in Science. (Retrieved from http//profiles. nlm. nih. gov/NN/Views/Exhibit/narrative/secndary. html) Tobacco. org. (2002) Public smoking banned. (Retrieved from http//www. tobacco. org/news/89098. html) Washburn, D. (2007). Public smoking banned in HKMainland next? Shanghaiist. (Retrieved from http//www. shanghiist. com/ pull in/2007/01/05/publicsmoking. php)